High Quality leadership growth network? Talent development has multiple needs. Is there a talent development program or tool that serves various talent development needs? Leadership coaching is such a tool and is the Swiss army knife of talent development. Leadership coaching helps to develop high potentials, succession planning, build a leadership pipeline, help leaders transition up and across, and overcome derailing behaviors of technically brilliant employees. A high potential employee is the one who has the talent, willingness, and commitment to take up leadership roles. They can deliver significantly better business results as compared with an average employee. They also demand more support, investment in their development, and a clear career path. If companies don’t motivate, challenge, and develop them, they will leave for better opportunities. It is essential to identify, develop, and retain high potential employees, or else the competitors will benefit from their ability and drive to achieve results.
In the TEAM coaching process, team members supporting each other as stakeholders and coaches, while implementing their action plans to make change visible. This program is ideally suited for leaders and their (cross-functional / project) teams to measurably change their individual and collective effectiveness. This happens while they lead and develop their teams, and at the same time develop their coaching skills to further role out this coaching process with their direct reports. TEAM coaching can be a very effective and cost-efficient way to grow leaders, change teams and develop the organizational culture.
Imagine that I have concocted a product – a new soft drink – which I think tastes amazing. But is that enough for the success of the product? Probably not! I will test my new drink with a few representative consumers. After all, they are going to buy or choose to ignore my product. I will allow them to sample my drink and give feedback. The question I will ask is whether the drink is good (based on their opinion/perception). The next question will be – what can I do to make it better? Consumers will give their feedback – let’s say it is too sugary, or not enough flavor, etc. I will make some changes to the drink, based on the number of consumers giving that same feedback. Then I will go back to the consumer and ask them to taste the altered drink and give their inputs. This process will be repeated for a few iterations until the overall feedback to the drink is positive.
Most employees feel that they have a lot more skills, capabilities, and talents than they get to use at work. Leadership behaviors determine how employee potential get utilized at work. Under the right leadership style, the same employee can perform much more efficiently and be more engaged at work. Imagine paying a 100% salary to use only 50% of the capabilities and potential of your entire human capital! Throughout our careers, most of us have experienced working under a good leader. In all likeliness, we have also worked under a not so good leader! Recall your personal experience. How was it working under a good leader? How about working under a not so good leader? What were the differences? Discover extra info at Best executive coach in India.
In 2004, Marshall Goldsmith and Howard Morgan reviewed a variety of leadership development initiatives in eight large multinational companies. It was a comprehensive study of over 86,000 leaders and executives globally, at these eight multinational companies. Although the desired outcome for all companies was identical – sustained change in behavior at work – they used a variety of tools and approaches. It included classroom-based training vs. on job practice, short-duration training vs. long-term interventions, coaching vs. mentoring, internal trainers and coaches vs. external trainers or coaches, etc.
Some companies regularly conduct so-called leadership training programs. This is to check the boxes and for ISO requirements – how many trainings, how many man-hours, etc. Other companies may have realized that they need to measure impact. Now, most companies measure Kirkpatrick’s first level evaluation – which is jokingly known as the feel-good feedback – whether the participants liked the training or not. A few companies have evolved to the next stage. They realize that “training programs” are NOT having any business impact. Then they opt for long term training intervention instead of just short duration training programs. They add assessments and follow up to help on job behavior change of the leaders. Even then the statistics on the effectiveness of leadership interventions, even those from big named B schools and top-notch vendors, are depressingly low.
Our mission is to develop leaders not only across organizations, but across all walks of life. To make the world better by developing better leaders. To consult and never to sell – Advise client what is in client’s best interest We are a team of passionate leadership development professionals who are certified in Marshall Goldsmith Stakeholder Centered Coaching process. See even more details on https://newageleadership.com/.
